· Very interesting and informative.
· The words are good but I think the definitions could be better though.
· Interesting. I like how there’s a humorous, abstract essence.
· I don’t think the definition was written very clearly but I was still able to understand the word.
· I think they are unique but some are somewhat inappropriate.
· It is ok. The words are better than the definitions.
· I think it’s not always clear but it mostly is. The whole thing is kind of strange but still interesting.
· The words are interesting and the definitions are clear.
2. Does the drawing correspond to the defined word?
· Yes they do, but some of them are disturbing.
· Some, no. Most of them do. I’m not sure what a horse has to do with a prostitute. (aventurero)
· Yes, in a very unique way.
· Sometimes they do but everyone has different opinions so maybe they all do.
· Yes, it does, they are very individual.
· Yes, but sometimes the drawings are a bit weird.
· Some of them don’t correspond to the defined word because some pictures are not matching.
· Sometimes. Sometimes I don’t get it.
· Most of the time.
· Yes, and it’s really funny.
· Sometimes it does but others times it’s not so accurate.
· Yes, but the drawings are a bit unrealistic.
· Some do, and some are wild.
3. Any suggestion to improve the project.
· Background? Some pictures are um… inappropriate.
· It’s good but you could perhaps use less “inappropriate” meanings/words.
· They could put more sensible words in it.
· Make more word on the wall because they’re really cool.
· Not really.
· The picture could be less disgusting.
· No, I like this project the way it is.
· Apart from illustrator problems. It’s fine.
· Other words, other types of pictures.